Evaluation of suicide prevention activities

Appendix F – Overarching Program Logic Model

Page last updated: January 2014

Refer to following text for a text description of Appendix F – Overarching Program Logic Model

Larger version of overarching program logic model

Larger version of overarching program logic model (PDF 40 KB) Top of page

Text version of overarching program logic model

The model details the logic flow-on effect that national strategies and inputs have as they filter down to programme level outcomes. The logic flow of the model describes the strategies/inputs which provide policy direction to shape programme activities/outputs, which subsequently provide short, medium and long term effects on an individual, community and service system level. As a result, the programme outcomes are highlighted as the final outcome of this model.

The following overarching contextual factors influence the model:

  • socioeconomic
  • cultural background
  • policy context
  • related government initiatives (e.g. mental health, family support and protective interventions, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander initiatives, justice, LGBTI supports)
  • rurality
Inclusions of each logical step of the model are as follows:

1. Strategies/Inputs

  • Living is For Everyone (LIFE) Framework
  • National Suicide Prevention Program
  • National Suicide Prevention Action Framework
  • The National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Suicide Prevention Strategy
  • Research into suicide prevention strategies

2. Activities/Outputs

  • Provision and consolidation of suicide prevention resources, information and research
  • Direct Individual Client Services to high risk groups
  • Community Focused Services/Activities for people at risk of suicide
  • Workforce Development and Training in recognising and responding to risk for front line workers, families and community members Top of page

3. Effects (short, medium and long term)

Individual

  • Increased opportunities for social connection and participation
  • Improved access to support and care for people feeling suicidal
  • Improved capability to respond at potential tipping points and points of imminent risk
  • Individuals experience local services linking effectively, resulting in seamless service delivery

Community

  • Increased community awareness of what is needed to prevent suicide
  • Improved community strength and resilience
  • Increased understanding of whole of community risk and protective factors, and how best to build resilience of communities and individuals
  • Improved understanding, skills and capacity of frontline workers, families and carers

Service System

  • Improved access to suicide prevention resources and information
  • Systematic, long term structural interventions in areas of greatest need
  • An environment that encourages and supports individual help seeking
  • Increased organisational capacity to respond appropriately to risk of suicide

4. Outcomes

  • Improved individual resilience and wellbeing
  • Reduced incidence of suicidal behaviour in the groups at highest risk
  • Reduced incidence of suicide in the groups at highest risk